Contact Us
— Main Menu —
ABOUT SSL
- History
- Contributors
DISCIPLINES
- Anthropology
- Economics
- History
- Philosophy
- Political Science
- Social Psychology
- Sociology
SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
- Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
- Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
- Galbraith Series
- Global History
NEWSLETTER
ABOUT SSL
History
Contributors
DISCIPLINES
Anthropology
Economics
History
Philosophy
Political Science
Social Psychology
Sociology
SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
Galbraith Series
Global History
NEWSLETTER
A Deleuzian Critique of Resource-use Management Politics in Industria
Home
>>
Political Science
>>
International Relations
>>
Globalization
>>
Politics of Globalization
>>
A Deleuzian Critique of...
A Deleuzian Critique of Resource-use Management Politics in Industria
Author(s)
Hipwell, William T.
Abstract
In an era of increasingly well-attended and violent protests around the world against globalization, this commentary seeks to answer the crucial question: The globalization of what? The answer proposed is that what is globalizing is ‘Industria’, a multiplicitous, global system of power/knowledge, a vast ‘machinic assemblage’ recently accreted from diverse, competing world systems. After describing some of the most serious challenges facing human communities and the rest of the biosphere, the commentary enlists the aid of the philosopher Gilles Deleuze and his colleague Félix Guattari to expose the cognitive errors underlying political and environmental problems. Applying Deleuze’s philosophy of difference to geopolitics and resource-use management, it is shown that representational epistemologies and a negative ontology of identity obscure the myriad interconnections among human and non-human beings, leading to conflict and ecological degradation. From there, the ‘Industria’ hypothesis is presented as a conceptual response to Deleuze and Guattari’s critique of the ‘Urstaat’ and as a framework for scholars grappling with the need to achieve socioeconomic and ecological sustainability. Finally, the commentary briefly explores the potential of a differential, bioregional geopolitics as a civilized alternative to the predations of Industria.
IssueNo
3
Pages
356-377
Article
Access to Article
Source
Canadian Geographer
VolumeNo
48
PubDate
September 2004
ISBN_ISSN
0008-3658
Globalization
Migration
Politics of Globalization
Transnational Corporations and Sovereignty