Contact Us
linkedin
twitter
  • ABOUT SSL
    • History
    • Contributors
  • DISCIPLINES
    • Anthropology
    • Economics
    • History
    • Philosophy
    • Political Science
    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology
  • SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
    • Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
    • Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
    • Galbraith Series
    • Global History
  • NEWSLETTER

Evolution vs./and Creation: Do Students Have to Choose?

  1. Home
  2. >>
  3. Anthropology
  4. >>
  5. Biological/Physical Anthropology
  6. >>
  7. Creationism and Science
  8. >>
  9. Evolution vs./and Creation: Do...
Evolution vs./and Creation: Do Students Have to Choose?
Author(s)Ayala, Francisco J.
AbstractI will, first, outline what we currently know about the last 4 million years of human evolutionary history, from bipedal but small-brained Australopithecus to modern Homo sapiens, our species, through the prolific toolmaker Homo habilis and me continent wanderer Homo erectus. I shall then identify anatomical traits that distinguish us from other animals and point out our two kinds of heredity, the biological and the cultural. Biological inheritance is based on the transmission of genetic information, in humans very much the same as in other sexually reproducing organisms. But cultural inheritance is distinctively human, based on transmission of information by a teaching and learning process that is in principle independent of biological parentage. Cultural inheritance makes possible the cumulative transmission of experience from generation to generation. I will, finally, explore ethical behavior as a model case of a distinctive human trait, and seek to ascertain the causal connections between human ethics and human biology. My conclusions are that (1) moral reasoning–that is, the proclivity to make ethical judgments by evaluating actions as either good or evil–is rooted in our biological nature; it is a necessary outcome of our exalted intelligence, but (2) the moral codes that guide our decisions as to which actions are good and which ones are evil are products of culture, including social and religious traditions. This second conclusion contradicts those evolutionists and sociobiologists who claim that the morally good is simply that which is promoted by the process of biological evolution.
IssueNo
Pages161
ArticleArticle Not Available
SourceAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
VolumeNo
PubDateAnnual 2003
ISBN_ISSN0002-9483
Browse Path(s)Anthropology
—-Biological/Physical Anthropology
——–Creationism and Science

Biological/Physical Anthropology

  • Biology, Eugenics, and Racism
  • Creationism and Science
  • Human Adaptation
  • Human Biology, Genetic Diversity and Human Physical Variety
  • Human Evolution/Anthropogenesis Evolutionary Theory
  • Medical Anthropology
  • Neuroanthropology
  • Paleoanthropology
  • Primatology


Boston University | ECI | Contact Us

Copyright Notification: The Social Science Library (SSL) is for distribution in a defined set of countries. The complete list may be found here. Free distribution within these countries is encouraged, but copyright law forbids distribution outside of these countries.