Contact Us
linkedin
twitter
  • ABOUT SSL
    • History
    • Contributors
  • DISCIPLINES
    • Anthropology
    • Economics
    • History
    • Philosophy
    • Political Science
    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology
  • SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
    • Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
    • Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
    • Galbraith Series
    • Global History
  • NEWSLETTER

New Ecology and the Social Sciences: What Prospects for a Fruitful Engagement?

  1. Home
  2. >>
  3. Anthropology
  4. >>
  5. Social/Cultural Anthropology
  6. >>
  7. Ecology and Resource Conservation
  8. >>
  9. New Ecology and the...
New Ecology and the Social Sciences: What Prospects for a Fruitful Engagement?
Author(s)Scoones, Ian
AbstractThis review asks the question: What new avenues of social science enquiry are suggested by new ecological thinking, with its focus on nonequilibrium dynamics, spatial and temporal variation, complexity, and uncertainty? Following a review of the emergence of the “new ecology” and the highlighting of contrasts with earlier “balance of nature” perspectives, work emerging from ecological anthropology, political ecology, environmental and ecological economics, and debates about nature and culture are examined. With some important exceptions, much social science work and associated popular and policy debates remain firmly wedded to a static and equilibrial view. This review turns to three areas where a more dynamic perspective has emerged. Each has the potential to take central elements of new ecological thinking seriously, sometimes with major practical consequences for planning, intervention design, and management. First is the concern with spatial and temporal dynamics developed in detailed and situated analyses of “people in places,” using, in particular, historical analysis as a way of explaining environmental change across time and space. Second is the growing understanding of environment as both the product of and the setting for human interactions, which link dynamic structural analyses of environmental processes with an appreciation of human agency in environmental transformation, as part of a “structuration” approach. Third is the appreciation of complexity and uncertainty in social-ecological systems and, with this, the recognition of that prediction, management, and control are unlikely, if not impossible.
IssueNo
Pages479-507
ArticleAccess to Article
SourceAnnual Review of Anthropology
VolumeNo28
PubDate1999
ISBN_ISSN0084-6570
Browse Path(s)Anthropology
—-Social/Cultural Anthropology
——–Ecology and Resource Conservation

Social/Cultural Anthropology

  • Colonization and Post-Colonialism
  • Culture
  • Culture Change
  • Ecology and Resource Conservation
  • Ethics, Morality, and Culture
  • Family, Marriage, and Kinship
  • Gender
  • Health and Medical Anthropology
  • Media and Technology
  • Migration, Displacement, and Resettlement
  • Political Practices, Organization, and Structure
  • Religion
  • Social Organization, Identity and Segregation
  • Society, Civilization, and Culture
  • Subsistence and Economic Practices, Organization, and Structure
  • Traditional and Tribal Societies
  • War, Violence, and Hegemony
  • Westernization and Modernity
  • Work and Alternative Livelihoods


Boston University | ECI | Contact Us

Copyright Notification: The Social Science Library (SSL) is for distribution in a defined set of countries. The complete list may be found here. Free distribution within these countries is encouraged, but copyright law forbids distribution outside of these countries.