Contact Us
linkedin
twitter
  • ABOUT SSL
    • History
    • Contributors
  • DISCIPLINES
    • Anthropology
    • Economics
    • History
    • Philosophy
    • Political Science
    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology
  • SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
    • Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
    • Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
    • Galbraith Series
    • Global History
  • NEWSLETTER

Size and Place in the Construction of Indigeneity in the Russian Federation

  1. Home
  2. >>
  3. Anthropology
  4. >>
  5. Social/Cultural Anthropology
  6. >>
  7. Social Organization, Identity and...
  8. >>
  9. Size and Place in...
Size and Place in the Construction of Indigeneity in the Russian Federation
Author(s)Donahoe, Brian; Habeck, Joachim Otto; Halemba, Agnieszka; Santha, Istvan
AbstractWithin the Russian Federation there are nearly 200 recognized “nationalities,” approximately 130 of which could claim to be “indigenous.” However, only 45 peoples are officially recognized as “indigenous small-numbered peoples of the Russian Federation” and thereby qualify for the rights, privileges, and state support earmarked for indigenous peoples. This status is conditioned upon a maximum group size of 50,000. While experts insist that this numerical criterion is provisional and without serious political implications, our fieldwork demonstrates that it has become a social fact that cannot be ignored, especially in light of the 2002 All-Russia Census and the release of its results in 2004. This numerical benchmark forces a dichotomization into small-numbered versus non-small numbered peoples and creates a peculiar type of identity politics based on ethnic-group size. The “indigenous small-numbered” status is also conditioned upon a set of overlapping but often contradictory residency requirements. Using case studies from southern Siberia and the north of European Russia, we document the dynamic interplay between these dimensions of identity and the opportunities for maneuvering in the competition for the benefits that attach to certain categories. However, indigenous peoples who engage in such identity politics run the risk of becoming “incarcerated” within the confines of those categories.
IssueNo6
Pages225-246
ArticleAccess to Article
SourceCultural Anthropology
VolumeNo49
PubDate2008
ISBN_ISSN

Social/Cultural Anthropology

  • Colonization and Post-Colonialism
  • Culture
  • Culture Change
  • Ecology and Resource Conservation
  • Ethics, Morality, and Culture
  • Family, Marriage, and Kinship
  • Gender
  • Health and Medical Anthropology
  • Media and Technology
  • Migration, Displacement, and Resettlement
  • Political Practices, Organization, and Structure
  • Religion
  • Social Organization, Identity and Segregation
  • Society, Civilization, and Culture
  • Subsistence and Economic Practices, Organization, and Structure
  • Traditional and Tribal Societies
  • War, Violence, and Hegemony
  • Westernization and Modernity
  • Work and Alternative Livelihoods


Boston University | ECI | Contact Us

Copyright Notification: The Social Science Library (SSL) is for distribution in a defined set of countries. The complete list may be found here. Free distribution within these countries is encouraged, but copyright law forbids distribution outside of these countries.