Contact Us
linkedin
twitter
  • ABOUT SSL
    • History
    • Contributors
  • DISCIPLINES
    • Anthropology
    • Economics
    • History
    • Philosophy
    • Political Science
    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology
  • SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
    • Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
    • Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
    • Galbraith Series
    • Global History
  • NEWSLETTER

Some Claims Made for Critical Realism in Economics: Two Case Studies

  1. Home
  2. >>
  3. Economics
  4. >>
  5. Economics as a Social...
  6. >>
  7. Philosophy, Sociology of Economics
  8. >>
  9. Some Claims Made for...
Some Claims Made for Critical Realism in Economics: Two Case Studies
Author(s)Hodgson, Geoffrey M.
AbstractInstead of examining critical realism directly, this essay critically examines claims made by two prominent critical realists, namely Andrew Collier and Tony Lawson, on behalf of their philosophy. These are (a) that critical realism supports Marx’s law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall, and (b) that critical realism is illustrated by the workplace organization theory of the relative decline of the British economy. It is argued that the first claim is false and the second is unsubstantiated. Furthermore, propositions that are rejected by Collier and Lawson are shown in fact to be consistent with critical realism. These two case studies raise important questions concerning the claims made for critical realism on behalf of its adherents. Some questions are also posed concerning the character of critical realism as a movement.
IssueNo1
Pages53-73
ArticleAccess to Article
SourceJournal of Economic Methodology
VolumeNo11
PubDateMarch2004
ISBN_ISSN1350-178x
Browse Path(s)

Economics as a Social Science

  • Alternatives to Mainstream Economics
  • Capitalism and Culture
  • Economic Ideas
  • Economics Education
  • Methods
  • Paradigms Compared
  • Philosophy, Sociology of Economics
  • Policy
  • Psychology and Behavior
  • Theory vs. Reality


Boston University | ECI | Contact Us

Copyright Notification: The Social Science Library (SSL) is for distribution in a defined set of countries. The complete list may be found here. Free distribution within these countries is encouraged, but copyright law forbids distribution outside of these countries.