Contact Us
linkedin
twitter
  • ABOUT SSL
    • History
    • Contributors
  • DISCIPLINES
    • Anthropology
    • Economics
    • History
    • Philosophy
    • Political Science
    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology
  • SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
    • Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
    • Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
    • Galbraith Series
    • Global History
  • NEWSLETTER

Breaking the Bonds of Precedent: The 1905-6 Government Reform Commission and the Remaking of the Qing Central State

  1. Home
  2. >>
  3. History
  4. >>
  5. Economic History
  6. >>
  7. History of Economic Thought
  8. >>
  9. World-wide
  10. >>
  11. Breaking the Bonds of...
Breaking the Bonds of Precedent: The 1905-6 Government Reform Commission and the Remaking of the Qing Central State
Author(s)Horowitz, Richard S.
AbstractExamines the significance of the 1905/06 Qing government reforms following the Boxer uprising and invasion of northern China. These reforms constituted a major shift in Chinese public administration, leaving behind the late imperial system in favor of a European-style ministerial one. While the attempt to establish constitutional monarchy proved transitory, the shift to a ministerial system has lasted. The focus here is on the attempts to transform the uppermost level of the central government. Also considered is the relation of the 1906 reforms to attempts to express criticisms and reform proposals as early as the 1860s, and the roles of both external pressures and a burgeoning Qing challenge of the old system in bringing about the reforms. K. Coddon.
IssueNo4
Pages775-797
ArticleAccess to Article
SourceModern Asian Studies
VolumeNo37
PubDateOctober2003
ISBN_ISSN0026-749X
Browse Path(s)

History of Economic Thought

  • Anglo-European
  • Mainstream U.S. Influences on Economic Thought
  • Marxist/Socialist
  • World-wide


Boston University | ECI | Contact Us

Copyright Notification: The Social Science Library (SSL) is for distribution in a defined set of countries. The complete list may be found here. Free distribution within these countries is encouraged, but copyright law forbids distribution outside of these countries.