Contact Us
— Main Menu —
ABOUT SSL
- History
- Contributors
DISCIPLINES
- Anthropology
- Economics
- History
- Philosophy
- Political Science
- Social Psychology
- Sociology
SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
- Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
- Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
- Galbraith Series
- Global History
NEWSLETTER
ABOUT SSL
History
Contributors
DISCIPLINES
Anthropology
Economics
History
Philosophy
Political Science
Social Psychology
Sociology
SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
Galbraith Series
Global History
NEWSLETTER
Spain Changes Course: Aznar’s Legacy, Zapatero’s Prospects
Home
>>
History
>>
Political History
>>
Governance
>>
Parties
>>
Spain Changes Course: Aznar’s...
Spain Changes Course: Aznar’s Legacy, Zapatero’s Prospects
Author(s)
Woodworth, Paddy
Abstract
An analysis of parliamentary electoral change in Spain in 2004. Former Spanish prime minister José MarÃÂa Aznar led his political party, the Partido Popular (PP), on a platform that tended to isolate three distinct ethnic groups within the country, the Basques, the Catalans, and the Galicians. His policies also included an attempt to revive Spain’s medieval position of primacy through opposing the French in European politics by associating the country’s battle against Basque terrorism with the American policy toward Iraq. The main opposition party, the Socialist Party (PSOE), seized on the government’s mismanagement of the terrorist attack on the Madrid train station, which was initially blamed on Basque terrorists rather than on the actual perpetrators, al-Qaeda. The PSOE linked that act with Spanish participation in the American-led coalition that invaded Iraq. The result was a restructuring of the Spanish government and the election of a new prime minister, José Luis RodrÃÂguez Zapatero.
IssueNo
2
Pages
7-26
Article
Access to Article
Source
World Policy Journal
VolumeNo
21
PubDate
Fall2004
ISBN_ISSN
0740-2775
Browse Path(s)
Governance
Despotism
Elections
Executive Power
Leadership Examples (Good and Bad): Non-Western
Leadership Examples (Good and Bad): Western
Legitimacy
Minority Groups
Parties
Reform