Contact Us
linkedin
twitter
  • ABOUT SSL
    • History
    • Contributors
  • DISCIPLINES
    • Anthropology
    • Economics
    • History
    • Philosophy
    • Political Science
    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology
  • SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
    • Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
    • Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
    • Galbraith Series
    • Global History
  • NEWSLETTER

The Permanent Court of International Justice, the International Court of Justice, the League of Nations, and the United Nations: A Comparative Empirical Survey

  1. Home
  2. >>
  3. History
  4. >>
  5. World/Global History
  6. >>
  7. Political Institutions
  8. >>
  9. League of Nations
  10. >>
  11. The Permanent Court of...
The Permanent Court of International Justice, the International Court of Justice, the League of Nations, and the United Nations: A Comparative Empirical Survey
Author(s)Coplin, William D.; Rochester, J. Martin
AbstractExplores empirical relationships in disputes before these four institutions. Such formal institutions of international conciliation were used more between the two world wars than after World War II. Nations of the West with open, competitive political systems are most apt to use these agencies. Nations that are similar to one another do not necessarily use the institutions more than dissimilar nations. The structure of the institution and history both have had significant influence on usage.
IssueNo2
Pages529-550
ArticleAccess to Article
SourceAmerican Political Science Review
VolumeNo66
PubDateJune1972
ISBN_ISSN0003-0554
Browse Path(s)

Political Institutions

  • League of Nations
  • Regional
  • United Nations


Boston University | ECI | Contact Us

Copyright Notification: The Social Science Library (SSL) is for distribution in a defined set of countries. The complete list may be found here. Free distribution within these countries is encouraged, but copyright law forbids distribution outside of these countries.