Contact Us
linkedin
twitter
  • ABOUT SSL
    • History
    • Contributors
  • DISCIPLINES
    • Anthropology
    • Economics
    • History
    • Philosophy
    • Political Science
    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology
  • SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
    • Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
    • Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
    • Galbraith Series
    • Global History
  • NEWSLETTER

New Ethics for Old? Or, How (Not) to Think About Future Generations

  1. Home
  2. >>
  3. Philosophy
  4. >>
  5. Rights and Justice
  6. >>
  7. Future Generations
  8. >>
  9. New Ethics for Old?...
New Ethics for Old? Or, How (Not) to Think About Future Generations
Author(s)Ball, Terence
AbstractRadical environmentalists often decry and dismiss as outmoded and dangerous the ‘Western’ ethic of individualism, of freedom and autonomy, of individual rights. They hope to replace this ethic with one that is post-individualist and non-Western, and either radically new or old and native-indigenous. Only then, they say, will the well-being of the planet and its present and future inhabitants be protected from the predation of the present generation. I argue that this view is unrealistic as well as unnecessary, in as much as Western liberal-individualist discourse contains at least some of the moral and conceptual resources out of which a responsible environmental ethic can be constructed.
IssueNo1
Pages89-110
ArticleAccess to Article
SourceEnvironmental Politics
VolumeNo10
PubDateSpring 2001
ISBN_ISSN0964-4016

Rights and Justice

  • Distributive Justice
  • Ethical Theory
  • Future Generations
  • Human Rights
  • Intergenerational Justice
  • International Justice
  • Women’s Rights/Gender Issues


Boston University | ECI | Contact Us

Copyright Notification: The Social Science Library (SSL) is for distribution in a defined set of countries. The complete list may be found here. Free distribution within these countries is encouraged, but copyright law forbids distribution outside of these countries.