Contact Us
linkedin
twitter
  • ABOUT SSL
    • History
    • Contributors
  • DISCIPLINES
    • Anthropology
    • Economics
    • History
    • Philosophy
    • Political Science
    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology
  • SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
    • Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
    • Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
    • Galbraith Series
    • Global History
  • NEWSLETTER

In Defense of Bacon

  1. Home
  2. >>
  3. Philosophy
  4. >>
  5. The Environment
  6. >>
  7. Philosophical Traditions
  8. >>
  9. Other
  10. >>
  11. In Defense of Bacon
In Defense of Bacon
Author(s)Soble, A.
AbstractAdvocates and scholars of science studies have partially attributed the rise of modern science to misogynous sexual metaphors. Bacon, however, seems to have escaped this trap, and Soble writes this chapter in a defense of Bacon’s work. Critics who have referred to the experimental method as being the ‘rape’ of mother nature by the ‘father’ scientist believe that the claimed superiority of modern science, based on experimentation, had foundations of a very misogynous metaphor. The author vehemently denies that Bacon can be described in these terms, let alone being called a proponent of such misogynous tactics. Bacon calls for an active and hands on approach to learning science or in various inquiries that one may embark upon, not merely being a passive observer of phenomenon.
IssueNo2
Pages192-215
ArticleAccess to Article
SourcePhilosophy of the Social Sciences
VolumeNo25
PubDateJune 1995
ISBN_ISSN0048-3931

Philosophical Traditions

  • Kant
  • Other
  • Plato
  • Virtue Ethics/Aristotle


Boston University | ECI | Contact Us

Copyright Notification: The Social Science Library (SSL) is for distribution in a defined set of countries. The complete list may be found here. Free distribution within these countries is encouraged, but copyright law forbids distribution outside of these countries.