Contact Us
linkedin
twitter
  • ABOUT SSL
    • History
    • Contributors
  • DISCIPLINES
    • Anthropology
    • Economics
    • History
    • Philosophy
    • Political Science
    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology
  • SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
    • Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
    • Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
    • Galbraith Series
    • Global History
  • NEWSLETTER

Responsibility and Fairness

  1. Home
  2. >>
  3. Philosophy
  4. >>
  5. Well-Being
  6. >>
  7. Concepts of Well-Being
  8. >>
  9. Well-Being and Morality
  10. >>
  11. Responsibility and Fairness
Responsibility and Fairness
Author(s)Sen, Amartya
AbstractJohn Rawls and other modern theorists of justice have tended to stress the need to see each person as being peculiarly responsible for matters over which she has control. In contrast, responsibility is not attributed to a person for something she could not have changed. The lines are sometimes hard to draw, but there is much plausibility in that general differentiation. The analysis presented in this selection makes use of that distinction.
IssueNo
Pages148-150
ArticleArticle Not Available
SourceInequality Reexamined
VolumeNo
PubDate1992
ISBN_ISSN0674452550

Concepts of Well-Being

  • Basic Needs
  • Capabilities/Functionings
  • Debates
  • Objective and Subjective Accounts
  • Quality of Life
  • Well-Being and Morality


Boston University | ECI | Contact Us

Copyright Notification: The Social Science Library (SSL) is for distribution in a defined set of countries. The complete list may be found here. Free distribution within these countries is encouraged, but copyright law forbids distribution outside of these countries.