Contact Us
linkedin
twitter
  • ABOUT SSL
    • History
    • Contributors
  • DISCIPLINES
    • Anthropology
    • Economics
    • History
    • Philosophy
    • Political Science
    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology
  • SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
    • Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
    • Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
    • Galbraith Series
    • Global History
  • NEWSLETTER

Comparing Policy Process Frameworks: What Do They Tell Us About Group Membership and Participation for Policy Development?

  1. Home
  2. >>
  3. Political Science
  4. >>
  5. Comparative Politics
  6. >>
  7. Political Systems, Processes and...
  8. >>
  9. Democracy
  10. >>
  11. Comparing Policy Process Frameworks:...
Comparing Policy Process Frameworks: What Do They Tell Us About Group Membership and Participation for Policy Development?
Author(s)Sobeck, Joanne
AbstractThe advocacy coalition framework (ACF), bureaucratic politics framework (BPF) and institutional analysis and development framework (IADF), which are used to view the policy development process, are examined. The results shows that membership and participation are best explained using the ACF and the IADF framework.
IssueNo3
Pages350-374
ArticleAccess to Article
SourceAdministration & Society
VolumeNo35
PubDateJuly 2003
ISBN_ISSN0095-3997

Political Systems, Processes and Transition

  • Democracy
  • Dictatorships and Militarism
  • Fascism and Neo-Fascism
  • Nationalism and Nation Building
  • Other
  • Socialism
  • Tribalism and Acephalous Societies


Boston University | ECI | Contact Us

Copyright Notification: The Social Science Library (SSL) is for distribution in a defined set of countries. The complete list may be found here. Free distribution within these countries is encouraged, but copyright law forbids distribution outside of these countries.