Contact Us
linkedin
twitter
  • ABOUT SSL
    • History
    • Contributors
  • DISCIPLINES
    • Anthropology
    • Economics
    • History
    • Philosophy
    • Political Science
    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology
  • SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
    • Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
    • Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
    • Galbraith Series
    • Global History
  • NEWSLETTER

Who Owes and Who Pays? The Accumulated Debt of Neoliberalism

  1. Home
  2. >>
  3. Political Science
  4. >>
  5. Political Theory and Philosophy
  6. >>
  7. Ideology
  8. >>
  9. Neoliberalism
  10. >>
  11. Who Owes and Who...
Who Owes and Who Pays? The Accumulated Debt of Neoliberalism
Author(s)De la Barra, Ximena
AbstractThe imposition of the neoliberal capitalist model in Latin America remains the principle obstacle to development with dignity and rights. This model immerses poor countries into debt, loots their natural resources and imposes public policies that contradict genuine social development. The pursuit of global development goals through increased social investment could help make payment on the social debt, but this process is vastly limited, especially by the external financial debt. Developing countries cannot manage both debts while their own resources are compromised by privatisation, de-nationalisation, heavily conditioned development assistance, and free trade agreements. A global human rights perspective on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) helps us to anticipate their limitations and contradictions. In Latin America, the MDGs fail to adequately reflect the social debt posed by the region’s enormous social inequalities. Those who most owe are really those who most benefit from the debt of others. Those who most pay are the excluded and vulnerable segments, namely, African descendants, indigenous peoples, and the region’s children. Current trends indicate that time is running out for reaching the MDG targets set for 2015. Neoliberalism’s inability to comply with existing global commitments illustrates the urgent need of constructing an alternative development model. The moment may be ripe for change in Latin America because there are hopeful signs of cracks in the imperial order.
IssueNo1
Pages125-161
ArticleAccess to Article
SourceCritical Sociology
VolumeNo32
PubDate 2006
ISBN_ISSN0896-9205

Ideology

  • Conservatism
  • Liberalism
  • Neoliberalism


Boston University | ECI | Contact Us

Copyright Notification: The Social Science Library (SSL) is for distribution in a defined set of countries. The complete list may be found here. Free distribution within these countries is encouraged, but copyright law forbids distribution outside of these countries.