Contact Us
linkedin
twitter
  • ABOUT SSL
    • History
    • Contributors
  • DISCIPLINES
    • Anthropology
    • Economics
    • History
    • Philosophy
    • Political Science
    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology
  • SPECIAL COLLECTIONS
    • Evolving Values for a Capitalist World
    • Frontier Issues in Economic Thought
    • Galbraith Series
    • Global History
  • NEWSLETTER

Accuracy of Person Perception: Do People Know What Kinds of Impressions They Convey?

  1. Home
  2. >>
  3. Social Psychology
  4. >>
  5. Social Cognition
  6. >>
  7. Perception, Judgment and Mental...
  8. >>
  9. Accuracy of Person Perception:...
Accuracy of Person Perception: Do People Know What Kinds of Impressions They Convey?
Author(s)DePaulo, Bella M.; Hoover, Claudia W.; Webb, William; Kenny, David A.; Oliver, Peter V.
AbstractDo people know what kinds of impressions they convey to other people during particular social interactions? In a study designed to answer this question, subjects interacted individually with three partners on each of four different tasks. After each interaction, participants reported their impressions of the other person’s likability and competence. They also postdicted the impressions they believed they conveyed to the other person along the same dimensions. Accuracy was computed as recommended by Cronbach (1955) and by Kenny’s (1981) Social Relations Model. Subjects could tell to a significant degree how the impressions they conveyed to their partners changed over time (time accuracy) and how they changed over time in different ways with different partners (differential accuracy). They could also tell how their competence was differentially perceived by different partners (dyadic accuracy). However, they were not very accurate at discerning which partners perceived them as most competent or most likable across all interactions (person accuracy). Subjects believed that they conveyed similar impressions of themselves to all of their partners, although actually partners evidenced little agreement with each other in their impressions of a given subject. The implications of these findings for symbolic-interactionist theories of the development of the self and impression-management perspectives on social behavior are described.
IssueNo2
Pages303-315
ArticleAccess to Article
SourceJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
VolumeNo52
PubDateFebruary 1987
ISBN_ISSN0022-3514

Social Cognition

  • Attitude, Emotions and Well-Being
  • Communication
  • Eurocentrism, Colonial and Post-Colonial Issues
  • Identity
  • Marketing, Persuasion, and Propaganda
  • Motivation
  • Perception, Judgment and Mental Representation
  • Motivation
  • Perception, Judgment and Mental Representation
  • Prejudice, Stigma and Discrimination
  • Race and Ethnicity


Boston University | ECI | Contact Us

Copyright Notification: The Social Science Library (SSL) is for distribution in a defined set of countries. The complete list may be found here. Free distribution within these countries is encouraged, but copyright law forbids distribution outside of these countries.